Before I rant, I'd just like to point out that I love statistics, especially those that can be used to help debt management clients, or to help our debt counsellors point their expertise in the right direction. With this in mind, I find it hard to see the point of a recent debt management news story, carried by both The Times and The Telegraph.
Both publications have released figures showing the numbers of personal insolvencies across the country. Both papers have taken the line that seaside towns are more affected by the recession than inland towns, due to the higher numbers of Insolvencies per 10,000 population in the majority of seaside towns.
I don't disagree with the findings of the report or the manner in which the figures were collected, but on inspection of said statistics I was perplexed at how newsworthy the figures were!
The highest number of personal insolvencies per 10,000 population could be found in Hull, at 26.6. This was slightly higher than the national average (15.7). If these debt management figures were percentages then there would be a considerable difference, but they're not. This is per 10,000 population i.e. 0.262% and 0.157% respectively.
If the worst town in the country has an insolvency rate of 0.105 percentage points higher than the national average, then there is surely very little difference nationally. If either paper had run stories explaining that insolvency rates are extremely simlar across the country then I would be more inclined to agree!
